What Is RFK’s Plan for Vaccines?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., now serving as the U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary, has introduced sweeping changes to vaccine testing and safety monitoring procedures in the United States. These reforms, unveiled in 2025, mark a significant shift in how vaccines are developed, approved, and tracked. Experts describe these changes as a “radical departure from past practices,” potentially altering the landscape of vaccine availability and development in the country.

New Vaccine Testing Requirements

Kennedy’s plan mandates that all new vaccines must undergo placebo-controlled trials before receiving approval. In these trials, some participants receive the actual vaccine, while others are given an inert substance, such as a saline injection. This approach allows researchers to compare outcomes and assess the vaccine’s efficacy and safety. While placebo-controlled trials are already standard for diseases like COVID-19, their universal application has sparked debate among experts.

For established vaccines, such as those for measles or polio, medical professionals have raised ethical concerns. Withholding proven vaccines from placebo groups in trials could pose moral dilemmas. In response, the HHS has exempted certain long-standing vaccines from these new requirements. For instance, the flu shot, which has been in use for over 80 years, will not be subject to these additional trials.

Changes to Vaccine Monitoring Systems

In April 2025, Kennedy announced plans to reform the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The goal is to automate and expand data collection on potential negative impacts of vaccines. During a “Make America Healthy Again” event in Indiana, Kennedy criticized the current surveillance system, calling it “outrageous” that it doesn’t function effectively. He emphasized the need for a more robust system to study the effects of vaccinations.

Kennedy’s stated objective is to investigate the potential contributions of vaccines, along with other environmental factors like mold, electromagnetic fields, and food, to various health conditions. He has suggested that these changes could help understand and potentially reverse rising rates of chronic conditions, including autism and diabetes.

Expert Concerns

Many health experts have expressed concerns about Kennedy’s plans. They worry that the new requirements could:

  • Make future vaccine approvals unnecessarily onerous
  • Reduce the availability of COVID-19 vaccines specifically
  • Potentially require retesting of already proven vaccines, slowing down production and access
  • Diminish public trust in vaccines

The HHS has yet to provide comprehensive details on how these new rules will be implemented or which specific vaccines will be affected.

Potential Legal Changes

Prior to these testing changes, Kennedy had also considered modifying legal protections for vaccine manufacturers. One significant action under consideration is removing HHS’s declaration that shields manufacturers and providers of COVID vaccines from legal liability—a protection currently extended through 2029.

Such a move could lead to substantial litigation over alleged vaccine injuries. Claims would shift from the specialized fund established by Congress for national emergencies to the federal vaccine court, which handles routine childhood immunization cases under the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

Kennedy has previously stated he would not take vaccines away from Americans, emphasizing his desire for greater transparency in vaccine science. However, his history of anti-vaccine advocacy through organizations like Children’s Health Defense has made some skeptical of these assurances.

Exemptions and Implementation Challenges

The HHS has clarified that certain long-standing vaccines, such as the flu shot, which has been in use for over 80 years, will be exempt from the new placebo-controlled trial requirements. This decision aims to balance the ethical concerns of withholding proven vaccines while still maintaining rigorous testing standards for new vaccines.

Reform of VAERS and Enhanced Monitoring

Kennedy’s plan includes the automation and expansion of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to improve the collection of data on potential negative impacts of vaccines. During a “Make America Healthy Again” event in Indiana, Kennedy emphasized the need for a more robust surveillance system, stating, “It’s outrageous that we don’t have a surveillance system that functions.”

The reform aims to incorporate additional datasets to study the effects of vaccinations comprehensively. Kennedy has suggested that these changes will help investigate the potential contributions of vaccines, along with other environmental factors such as mold, electromagnetic fields, and food, to various health conditions. He believes this could help understand and potentially reverse rising rates of chronic conditions, including autism and diabetes.

Expert Concerns and Potential Consequences

Health experts have raised several concerns about Kennedy’s plans, including the possibility of making future vaccine approvals unnecessarily onerous, reducing the availability of COVID-19 vaccines, and potentially requiring retesting of already proven vaccines. These changes could slow down production and access to essential vaccines, potentially leading to public health challenges.

Additionally, there are concerns that the new requirements could diminish public trust in vaccines. The HHS has not yet provided comprehensive details on how these new rules will be implemented or which specific vaccines will be affected, leaving many stakeholders in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries uncertain about the future of vaccine development and distribution.

Legal Implications and Vaccine Manufacturer Liability

Prior to the announcement of these testing changes, Kennedy had also considered modifying legal protections for vaccine manufacturers. One significant action under consideration is removing HHS’s declaration that shields manufacturers and providers of COVID vaccines from legal liability—a protection currently extended through 2029.

Such a move could lead to substantial litigation over alleged vaccine injuries, as claims would shift from the specialized fund established by Congress for national emergencies to the federal vaccine court that handles routine childhood immunization cases under the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. This could create a more complex legal landscape for vaccine manufacturers and providers, potentially impacting their willingness to develop and distribute vaccines in the future.

Kennedy’s Assurance and Skepticism

Kennedy has stated that he would not take vaccines away from Americans, emphasizing his desire for greater transparency in vaccine science. However, his history of anti-vaccine advocacy through organizations like Children’s Health Defense has led to skepticism among some experts and members of the public. While Kennedy assures that his goal is to improve vaccine safety and transparency, his past actions have raised concerns about his intentions and the potential impact of his policies on public health.

Conclusion

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s plan for vaccines represents a significant shift in how vaccines are tested, monitored, and regulated in the United States. By mandating placebo-controlled trials for new vaccines and reforming the VAERS system, Kennedy aims to enhance transparency and safety. However, these changes have sparked debate among health experts, who raise concerns about potential delays in vaccine approvals, reduced availability of critical vaccines like those for COVID-19, and the ethical challenges of retesting established vaccines.

While Kennedy has assured the public that his goal is to improve vaccine safety and trust, his history of anti-vaccine advocacy has led to skepticism. The exemptions for long-standing vaccines, such as the flu shot, indicate a balanced approach, but the lack of detailed implementation plans leaves many questions unanswered. As the HHS moves forward with these reforms, the impact on public health, vaccine development, and legal landscapes will be closely watched.

FAQ

What is RFK’s plan for vaccines?

RFK’s plan introduces sweeping changes to vaccine testing and safety monitoring, including mandatory placebo-controlled trials for new vaccines and reforms to the VAERS system to improve data collection on potential adverse events.

What vaccines are exempt from the new testing requirements?

Long-standing vaccines, such as the flu shot, which has been in use for over 80 years, are exempt from the new placebo-controlled trial requirements to address ethical concerns.

How is the VAERS system being reformed?

The VAERS system is being automated and expanded to improve data collection on potential negative impacts of vaccines. The reforms aim to incorporate additional datasets to study the effects of vaccinations more comprehensively.

What are the concerns about RFK’s plan?

Experts are concerned that the new requirements could delay vaccine approvals, reduce the availability of COVID-19 vaccines, require retesting of proven vaccines, and diminish public trust in vaccines.

Could vaccine manufacturers lose legal protections?

Kennedy has considered removing legal protections for vaccine manufacturers, which could lead to increased litigation over alleged vaccine injuries and shift claims to federal vaccine court.

Will existing vaccines be retested?

While new vaccines will undergo placebo-controlled trials, certain long-standing vaccines, such as those for measles or polio, are exempt from retesting due to ethical and practical considerations.